Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Health warning for single men.

Interesting fact which sparked me posting about this: Men who are married live longer on average than bachelors. There are added benefits if they marry women younger than them. This is because men who marry are looked after by their wives, we can suppose.

This is golden proof for my long-held theory that singleness is as bad for men than for women, or at least quite bad in different and unnoticed ways. The following observations are general* and based on my limited experience, and I'm not talking about young single men who haven't married so much as maturing men who seem to be aimlessly or unwillingly single, so don't go applying it all to your own situation. But I think there is a grain of truth here, among my random opinions.

1) Single women are high-profile; not, like, whinging, but everyone knows that they are single and it is unfortunate… biological clocks, real grief at missing out on raising a family, etc etc. There is nothing obviously unfortunate about single men—it can seem to be simply their own choice, mistake or failure. So women are getting all the pity and attention.

2) Single men do not seem as interested in singleness as an issue. Where women go "why, God? I want to be married!" and read books about singleness, listen to sermons, spend time questioning God's purpose for their life outside of marriage, blog and vent about it, and for fun watch chick movies about finding marriage, men don't. They are missing the bad things but also potentially the helpful and guiding things, and missing the pastoral care that single women seek out.

3) Single men are more likely to end up loners. Women are more naturally social, and get together to empathise and support each other. Unmarried men miss out on the socialising influence of their wife and family. Single women are more likely to flat together, men are more likely to flat alone—possibly for financial reasons, but it's another element of aloneness.

Single men are more likely to get weird. I'm not sure if all weird older loner men are single because they are weird, or if singleness is actually a major contributing factor to weirdness. Or if it comes down to the socialising factor of the wife/family. Either way, the value of having a wife to choose a shirt for you or nag you to get a haircut is enormous.

4) Men who stay single because it is more fun than marriage, who think they have the social skills to stay cool and want to enjoy their freedom to travel or be a slob or a workaholic or whatever… end up lame. It backfires on them. You can be single and cool and free when you're 28, but 5 years later you'll be single and sort of lame and immature, and in another 5 years you WILL be in the weird loner category and no woman will want you, because you were trying to extend your youth—while she was crying out "why God?" and growing in godliness (hopefully).

5) Unfortunately, according to Phillip Jensen at least, it seems that after 30 or so single men lose confidence to ask women out. Perhaps the rejection of a few women solidifies into self-doubt. Although much worse in my opinion are the desperate and not-shy men who hang around only the pretty single women in church. That is not the way to go! As mentioned before, women notice everything, and you will alert the Creepy Stalker Radar of every woman very quickly.

So if there is anything helpful I want to say about this, it is that older single men are probably more unsupported by church community than single women, and should fight the pull of loner land. And young single men should take warning and not leave it too late—get married before you get weird. Just kidding. They should prayerfully consider their reasons for singleness and the implications for ministry and their future.

* Where an opinion is general, it is usually correct. Jane Austen.

8 comments:

  1. I'd contest no. 2; I've known a number of single Christian men who struggle just as much with singleness as the single Christian women I know. Unfortunately, however, it seems like they fall for the wrong girls (i.e. the girls who don't really like them).

    The ones I know are not weird or creepy, but for some reason, they are not seeing the other single Christian women around them (or perhaps it's that the single Christian women I know and the single Christian men I know [which, admittedly, are fewer now than before] don't mix in the same social circles).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Which then leads me to wonder whether it is appropriate (as a married Christian woman) to play matchmaker insofar as I have it in my power to invite the single Christian men and the single Christian women I know over for dinner at the same time, and see if they hit it off. Would that be insulting?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Married men live longer because they live boring lives while their single contemporaries are jumping out of planes playing double-headed guitars.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You're right; there does seem to be a causal relationship between 'single male' & 'weird', & I'm pretty sure it goes that a single man gets weird as he gets older, much less that he's single because he's weird, although that might be true, too. It's possible that to make a deliberate choice to stay single in order to serve God (Chappo-style) might make a difference in the weird stakes. But to drift into singleness, by choosing to not choose, is a dangerous choice.

    This is like so many of our choices, isn't it? We think that the big choices we make are the only important ones, but it's so often the little, unthought-out choices that add up to poor outcomes. We put on kilograms one chocolate biscuit at a time, & we go broke one CD at a time, & marriages break down one sharp word at a time.

    Ooh. I could write my own blog about this, couldn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  5. apparently john stott didn't deliberately choose to be single.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This post made me laugh a little, esp. 3b. Hahaha.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I can't even begin to tell you how offended I am by this post.
    On so many levels I am offended.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for all these comments, they are interesting.

    Point 2 relates to point 1 in that mens' struggles with singleness are not as high-profile. And they are more alone in their struggles. Which is a pity. Whether or not they are normal, weird or skydiving. Agree with your point, Karen. It must be a hard for men who struggle with singleness.

    Match-making is an interesting thing. It may be practical and it's probably not unbiblical, compared to dating at least. Women occasionally confess that they like the idea of it; "Introduction With Intent" I would call it. Women do everything with intent anyway, because we constantly speculate, but maybe men need more targeted opportunities.

    I wonder if John Stott was weird ;-) I do believe that singleness is not Plan B, and that whatever situation you are in then that is how God growing you in godliness—that is his best for you.

    I'm sorry that I offended somebody so much. That's the unfortunate danger of blogging and blog reading: it's not face to face between people who understand each other intimately, and we can be anonymously offended (a subtle hint that I find anonymousness discourteous on many levels). Apologies to you.

    Actually, quite surprised that it took this blog so long to finally offend someone, since I use jelssie as an outlet for my impertinence. I knew it was a high-risk topic, which is why I let it brew for many months before I posted it, but I thought it was worth talking about, and somebody did complain that jelssie was getting too girly. Back to the normal dull posts about food and Jane Austen, now!

    ReplyDelete